Re: Small note on 'dd' and cross platform block sizes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/07/2014, at 2:30 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:48:18AM +0100, Justin Clift wrote:
>>> It turns out that with the 'dd' command, the block size parameter
>>> (bs=) needs a bit of special treatment to work cross-platform.
>>> 
>>> Instead of using the 'M' suffix (eg 1M for 1MB), it's better to
>>> use the k suffix.  eg 1024k for 1MB.
>> 
>> For the sake of completeness:
>> Linux uses M for megabyte, BSD(incorrecly) uses m
>> Both use k for kilobyte. This is why 1024k is better than 1M or 1m.
> 
> Does the BSD version also support status=none to make it work
> silently instead of spewing block counts to stderr?  If not, I might
> suggest that we switch to using our own wrapper that detects the
> platform to do the appropriate uppercase/lowercase and extra
> arguments vs. shell redirection in each case.


Maybe we should 2>/dev/null ?

+ Justin

--
GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org

An open source, distributed file system scaling to several
petabytes, and handling thousands of clients.

My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux