Re: regarding spurious failure tests/bugs/bug-1112559.t

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/07/2014, at 12:44 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
<snip>
> A lot of regression runs are failing because of this test unit. Given feature freeze is around the corner, shall we provide a +1 verified manually for those patchsets that fail this test?


Went through and did this manually, as "Gluster Build System".

Also got Joe set up so he can debug things on a Rackspace VM
to find out what's wrong.

+ Justin

--
GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org

An open source, distributed file system scaling to several
petabytes, and handling thousands of clients.

My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux