> I see that most of the tests are doing umount and these may fail > sometimes because of EBUSY etc. I am wondering if we should change all > of them to umount -l. > Let me know if you foresee any problems. I think I'd try "umount -f" first. Using -l too much can cause an accumulation of zombie mounts. When I'm hacking around on my own, I sometimes have to do "umount -f" twice but that's always sufficient. _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
