Re: Shall we revert quota-anon-fd.t?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



We can revert it for now and fix later post the release.

+1

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Raghavendra Bhat" <rabhat@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 11:34:51 AM
> Subject: Re:  Shall we revert quota-anon-fd.t?
> 
> On Wednesday 11 June 2014 08:21 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> > hi,
> >    I see that quota-anon-fd.t is causing too many spurious failures. I
> > think we should revert it and raise a bug so that it can be fixed and
> > committed again along with the fix.
> >
> > Pranith
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> 
> +1
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> 
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux