Hi,
Thanks for confirming the presence and reasons for 1 IP address - that's what I would expect to see.
The system in question is an internal red hat cluster - that we're trying to understand, since it's tripping up gstatus :)
a gluster peer status for an 8 node cluster is returning **2** nodes as IP addresses
redhat-storage-server-2.1.1.0-6.el6rhs.noarch
glusterfs-server-3.4.0.44rhs-1.el6rhs.x86_64
glusterfs-server-3.4.0.44rhs-1.el6rhs.x86_64
What I wanted to understand was whether there is something 'obvious' to explain the IP adddresses.
Since there isn't - I'll get the sysadmin to raise a BZ, and post the BZ to the list.
Cheers,
PC
From: "Kaushal M" <kshlmster@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Paul Cuzner" <pcuzner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, 28 May, 2014 5:49:10 PM
Subject: Re: IP addresses in peer status/pool listThis is surprising. There hasn't been any change that could cause this
kind of behaviour AFAICT.Normally, the peer from which the probes were performed would be shown
using IPs on the other nodes. But if a reverse probe with hostnames
should fix this too.Could you share more information on your setup (version, logs, etc)?~kaushalOn Wed, May 28, 2014 at 5:27 AM, Paul Cuzner <pcuzner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone shed any light on why I see IP addresses in peer status or pool
> list output instead of names?
>
> In clusters where the names were used in the probes, and volumes built with
> node names I see IP's in the peer status output?
>
> This has been the case for a while - I just like to understand why?
>
> I've even seen some output where 2 nodes are listed by IP instead of names..
>
> Cheers,
>
> Paul C
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
