----- Original Message -----
> From: "Justin Clift" <justin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 11:01:36 PM
> Subject: Re: Regression testing results for master branch
>
> On 21/05/2014, at 6:17 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Kicked off 21 VM's in Rackspace earlier today, running the regression tests
> > against master branch.
> >
> > Only 3 VM's failed out of the 21 (86% PASS, 14% FAIL), with all three being
> > for the same test:
> >
> > Test Summary Report
> > -------------------
> > ./tests/bugs/bug-948686.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 20 Failed:
> > 2)
> > Failed tests: 13-14
> > Files=230, Tests=4373, 5601 wallclock secs ( 2.09 usr 1.58 sys + 1012.66
> > cusr 688.80 csys = 1705.13 CPU)
> > Result: FAIL
>
>
> Interestingly, this one looks like a simple time based thing
> too. The failed tests are the ones after the sleep:
>
> ...
> #modify volume config to see change in volume-sync
> TEST $CLI_1 volume set $V0 write-behind off
> #add some files to the volume to see effect of volume-heal cmd
> TEST touch $M0/{1..100};
> TEST $CLI_1 volume stop $V0;
> TEST $glusterd_3;
> sleep 3;
> TEST $CLI_3 volume start $V0;
> TEST $CLI_2 volume stop $V0;
> TEST $CLI_2 volume delete $V0;
>
> Do you already have this one on your radar?
It wasn't, thanks for bringing it on my radar :-). Sent http://review.gluster.org/7837 to address this.
Pranith
>
> + Justin
>
> --
> Open Source and Standards @ Red Hat
>
> twitter.com/realjustinclift
>
>
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
