hi,
Please resubmit the patches on top of http://review.gluster.com/#/c/7753 to prevent frequent regression failures.
Pranith
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Vijaikumar M" <vmallika@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Joseph Fernandes" <josferna@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 2:40:47 PM
> Subject: Re: Spurious failures because of nfs and snapshots
>
> Brick disconnected with ping-time out:
>
> Here is the log message
> [2014-05-19 04:29:38.133266] I [MSGID: 100030] [glusterfsd.c:1998:main]
> 0-/build/install/sbin/glusterfsd: Started running /build/install/sbi
> n/glusterfsd version 3.5qa2 (args: /build/install/sbin/glusterfsd -s
> build.gluster.org --volfile-id /snaps/patchy_snap1/3f2ae3fbb4a74587b1a9
> 1013f07d327f.build.gluster.org.var-run-gluster-snaps-3f2ae3fbb4a74587b1a91013f07d327f-brick3
> -p /var/lib/glusterd/snaps/patchy_snap1/3f2ae3f
> bb4a74587b1a91013f07d327f/run/build.gluster.org-var-run-gluster-snaps-3f2ae3fbb4a74587b1a91013f07d327f-brick3.pid
> -S /var/run/51fe50a6faf0aa e006c815da946caf3a.socket --brick-name
> /var/run/gluster/snaps/3f2ae3fbb4a74587b1a91013f07d327f/brick3 -l
> /build/install/var/log/glusterfs/br
> icks/var-run-gluster-snaps-3f2ae3fbb4a74587b1a91013f07d327f-brick3.log
> --xlator-option *-posix.glusterd-uuid=494ef3cd-15fc-4c8c-8751-2d441ba
> 7b4b0 --brick-port 49164 --xlator-option
> 3f2ae3fbb4a74587b1a91013f07d327f-server.listen-port=49164)
> 2 [2014-05-19 04:29:38.141118] I
> [rpc-clnt.c:988:rpc_clnt_connection_init] 0-glusterfs: defaulting
> ping-timeout to 30secs
> 3 [2014-05-19 04:30:09.139521] C
> [rpc-clnt-ping.c:105:rpc_clnt_ping_timer_expired] 0-glusterfs: server
> 10.3.129.13:24007 has not responded in the last 30 seconds, disconnecting.
>
>
>
> Patch 'http://review.gluster.org/#/c/7753/' will fix the problem, where
> ping-timer will be disabled by default for all the rpc connection except
> for glusterd-glusterd (set to 30sec) and client-glusterd (set to 42sec).
>
>
> Thanks,
> Vijay
>
>
> On Monday 19 May 2014 11:56 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> > The latest build failure also has the same issue:
> > Download it from here:
> > http://build.gluster.org:443/logs/glusterfs-logs-20140518%3a22%3a27%3a31.tgz
> >
> > Pranith
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Vijaikumar M" <vmallika@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> To: "Joseph Fernandes" <josferna@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Gluster Devel"
> >> <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Sent: Monday, 19 May, 2014 11:41:28 AM
> >> Subject: Re: Spurious failures because of nfs and snapshots
> >>
> >> Hi Joseph,
> >>
> >> In the log mentioned below, it say ping-time is set to default value
> >> 30sec.I think issue is different.
> >> Can you please point me to the logs where you where able to re-create
> >> the problem.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Vijay
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Monday 19 May 2014 09:39 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> >>> hi Vijai, Joseph,
> >>> In 2 of the last 3 build failures,
> >>> http://build.gluster.org/job/regression/4479/console,
> >>> http://build.gluster.org/job/regression/4478/console this
> >>> test(tests/bugs/bug-1090042.t) failed. Do you guys think it is
> >>> better
> >>> to revert this test until the fix is available? Please send a patch
> >>> to revert the test case if you guys feel so. You can re-submit it
> >>> along with the fix to the bug mentioned by Joseph.
> >>>
> >>> Pranith.
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>> From: "Joseph Fernandes" <josferna@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Sent: Friday, 16 May, 2014 5:13:57 PM
> >>>> Subject: Re: Spurious failures because of nfs and snapshots
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi All,
> >>>>
> >>>> tests/bugs/bug-1090042.t :
> >>>>
> >>>> I was able to reproduce the issue i.e when this test is done in a loop
> >>>>
> >>>> for i in {1..135} ; do ./bugs/bug-1090042.t
> >>>>
> >>>> When checked the logs
> >>>> [2014-05-16 10:49:49.003978] I [rpc-clnt.c:973:rpc_clnt_connection_init]
> >>>> 0-management: setting frame-timeout to 600
> >>>> [2014-05-16 10:49:49.004035] I [rpc-clnt.c:988:rpc_clnt_connection_init]
> >>>> 0-management: defaulting ping-timeout to 30secs
> >>>> [2014-05-16 10:49:49.004303] I [rpc-clnt.c:973:rpc_clnt_connection_init]
> >>>> 0-management: setting frame-timeout to 600
> >>>> [2014-05-16 10:49:49.004340] I [rpc-clnt.c:988:rpc_clnt_connection_init]
> >>>> 0-management: defaulting ping-timeout to 30secs
> >>>>
> >>>> The issue is with ping-timeout and is tracked under the bug
> >>>>
> >>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096729
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> The workaround is mentioned in
> >>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096729#c8
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Joe
> >>>>
> >>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>> From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> To: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Cc: "Joseph Fernandes" <josferna@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Sent: Friday, May 16, 2014 6:19:54 AM
> >>>> Subject: Spurious failures because of nfs and snapshots
> >>>>
> >>>> hi,
> >>>> In the latest build I fired for review.gluster.com/7766
> >>>> (http://build.gluster.org/job/regression/4443/console) failed
> >>>> because
> >>>> of
> >>>> spurious failure. The script doesn't wait for nfs export to be
> >>>> available. I fixed that, but interestingly I found quite a few
> >>>> scripts
> >>>> with same problem. Some of the scripts are relying on 'sleep 5'
> >>>> which
> >>>> also could lead to spurious failures if the export is not
> >>>> available
> >>>> in 5
> >>>> seconds. We found that waiting for 20 seconds is better, but
> >>>> 'sleep
> >>>> 20'
> >>>> would unnecessarily delay the build execution. So if you guys are
> >>>> going
> >>>> to write any scripts which has to do nfs mounts, please do it the
> >>>> following way:
> >>>>
> >>>> EXPECT_WITHIN 20 "1" is_nfs_export_available;
> >>>> TEST mount -t nfs -o vers=3 $H0:/$V0 $N0;
> >>>>
> >>>> Please review http://review.gluster.com/7773 :-)
> >>>>
> >>>> I saw one more spurious failure in a snapshot related script
> >>>> tests/bugs/bug-1090042.t on the next build fired by Niels.
> >>>> Joesph (CCed) is debugging it. He agreed to reply what he finds and
> >>>> share
> >>>> it
> >>>> with us so that we won't introduce similar bugs in future.
> >>>>
> >>>> I encourage you guys to share what you fix to prevent spurious failures
> >>>> in
> >>>> future.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>> Pranith
> >>>>
> >>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
