Re: Regression tests: Should we test non-XFS too?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/07/2014 05:17 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
On 05/06/2014 10:44 PM, B.K.Raghuram wrote:
For those of us who are toying with the idea of using ZFS as the
underlying filesystem but are hesitating only because it is not widely
tested, a regression test on ZFS would be very welcome. If there are
some issues running it at redhat for license reasons,

Yes, there are issues with running it at Red Hat for exactly those reasons.

License issues and in general we don't test on out of upstream tree (and I know the open zfs team itself are not the reason that it is out of tree :))

ric


 would it help if
someone outside ran the tests and reported the results periodically?

Yes, if someone were to do that I'm sure it would be appreciated.


_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux