Re: regarding special treatment of ENOTSUP for setxattr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I think with "repetitive log message suppression" patch being merged, we don't really need gf_log_occasionally (except if they are logged in DEBUG or TRACE levels).

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Vijay Bellur" <vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx, "Anand Avati" <aavati@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, 7 May, 2014 3:12:10 PM
> Subject: Re:  regarding special treatment of ENOTSUP for setxattr
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Vijay Bellur" <vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Anand Avati"
> > <aavati@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 7:16:12 PM
> > Subject: Re:  regarding special treatment of ENOTSUP for
> > setxattr
> > 
> > On 05/06/2014 01:07 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> > > hi,
> > >    Why is there occasional logging for ENOTSUP errno when setxattr fails?
> > >
> > 
> > In the absence of occasional logging, the log files would be flooded
> > with this message every time there is a setxattr() call.
> 
> How to know which keys are failing setxattr with ENOTSUPP if it is not logged
> when the key keeps changing?
> 
> Pranith
> > 
> > -Vijay
> > 
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> 
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux