----- Original Message ----- > > Sounds like a good idea. A good way to figure out reviewers for a > particular directory might be to identify members in the community who > have contributed and/or reviewed more than X percentage of patches in > that particular directory. X should be significant and a good starting > value can be 25. I just want to point out that all contributors to the Gluster code base are "in the community." There is no such thing as a non-community contributor to the GlusterFS code base. > > In the case of we not having even a single individual who exceeds X, we > can pick up the top 2-3 reviewers/code contributors. See above - this means that Red Hat employees are also included here. Even you :) Not sure if I'm misunderstanding you, but the implication, as I interpreted it, was that somehow Red Hat contributors are not "in the community." I just want to point out that this is incorrect. If that was not your intent and I completely misunderstood, then my apologies :) My 0.02 - a MAINTAINERS or CONTRIBUTORS file is a great idea. Niels, are you volunteering? :) -JM
