Anand Avati <avati@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The context here is the POSIX-"like" style of API exposed by GFAPI, and not > dependent on what syscalls the platform provides. Oh right, then there is no impact. > Good to know (separately) > that the *at() syscalls will be supported in NetBSD in sometime. We implemented them, but pulling up to netbsd-6 branch would be way too intrusive for a release branch. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@xxxxxxxxxx
