Will take about 2 hours to setup test env, also build seems to be failed but does not seem to be caused by the patch :/
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Anand Avati <avati@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Can you please confirm if http://review.gluster.org/5979 fixes the problem of #998967 for you? If so we will backport and include the patch in 3.4.1.Thanks,AvatiOn Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Anand Avati <avati@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I have a theory for #998967 (that posix-acl is not doing the right thing after chmod/setattr). Preparing a patch, will appreciate if you can test it quickly.
AvatiOn Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Lukáš Bezdička <lukas.bezdicka@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No, I see issues reported in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998967 which is probably related to BZ#991035.On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On 09/18/2013 02:45 PM, Lukáš Bezdička wrote:Checking again. Are you seeing issues reported in both BZ#991035 and BZ#990830 with 3.4.1qa2?
Tested with glusterfs-3.4.1qa2-1.el6.x86_64 issue with ACL is still
there, unless one applies patch from http://review.gluster.org/#/c/5693/
which shoots through the caches and takes ACLs from server or sets
entry-timeout=0 it returns wrong values. This is probably because ACL
mask being applied incorrectly in posix_acl_inherit_mode, but I'm no C
expert to say so :(
Thanks,
Vijay
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
