Re: Regression test for 821056

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/27/2013 08:50 AM, Anand Avati wrote:
The same test seems to finish in ~ 12s on my laptop:

# prove --timer ./tests/bugs/bug-821056.t
[11:34:17] ./tests/bugs/bug-821056.t .. ok    12264 ms

Well, it seems to be stemming from patch 5376 as per jenkins:

http://build.gluster.org/job/regression/1769/console

I consistently get this result on my laptop:

[root@deepthought glusterfs.git]# prove --timer ./tests/bugs/bug-821056.t
[09:10:58] ./tests/bugs/bug-821056.t .. ok  1220937 ms
[09:31:19]
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=22, 1222 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.00 sys + 0.92 cusr 0.67 csys = 1.64 CPU)
Result: PASS

A lot of the recent regression test runs in jenkins does show bug-821056.t to be taking around 1040+ seconds.

-Vijay



On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    After patch 5111 got merged,  821056.t seems to take about 17+
    minutes. Do we know why?

    [11:31:54] ./tests/bugs/bug-821056.t ......................... ok
       1046 s

    Thanks,
    Vijay


    _________________________________________________
    Gluster-devel mailing list
    Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>
    https://lists.nongnu.org/__mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
    <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel>






[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux