Re: The return of the all-null pending matrix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/15/2013 12:41 AM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Vijay Bellur <vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I checked the logs and did not notice anything unusual in the logs.
Do you have multiple clients involved? Does turning off eager-locking
through:

No multiple clients. Is it then relevant to test eager-lock?


FWIW, it is. self-heal daemon and a client can also contend for locks. Messages of this sort make me wonder where the contention is coming from:

[2013-06-28 21:45:30.217139] I [afr-lk-common.c:1075:afr_lock_blocking] 0-gfs34-replicate-0: unable to lock on even one child [2013-06-28 21:45:30.217189] I [afr-transaction.c:1063:afr_post_blocking_inodelk_cbk] 0-gfs34-replicate-0: Blocking inodelks failed.

-Vijay



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux