Re: RFC - "Connection Groups" concept

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 27/06/2013, at 2:37 PM, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 11:04:07 -0400
> Jeff Darcy <jdarcy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> [Jeff on UUIDs]
> 
> I generally vote against using UUIDs and for IPs.
> In runtime I can easily switch an IP in a replacement situation, but can I
> switch a UUID in the same easy manner?
> Sometimes you want replacement _without_ volume reconfiguration.

That's a good point.  If we do go with using UUID's as the sole
representation internally, it might make sense to allow SysAdmins
to manipulate UUID's in useful ways.

Through the CLI, it could be something like this:

  gluster1> $ sudo gluster peer updateuuid mypeername NEW-UUID-VALUE
  peer alias update: success

BUT... I don't yet understand the failure modes that people have
mentioned around UUID's, so that's just an off-the-cuff thought
rather than a deeply-thought-out-with-appropriate-wisdom one. :)

+ Justin

> -- 
> Regards,
> Stephan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

--
Open Source and Standards @ Red Hat

twitter.com/realjustinclift




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux