Re: Proposal to change locking in data-self-heal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Proposal to change locking in data-self-heal
From: Jeff Darcy <jdarcy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 09:26:25 -0400
Cc: Ravishankar Narayanankutty <ranaraya@xxxxxxxxxx>, Raghavan Pichai <rpichai@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anand Avati <aavati@xxxxxxxxxx>, devel <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1992835909.6309784.1369227445424.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130311 Thunderbird/17.0.4

On 05/22/2013 08:57 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> So you guys are OK with this proposal if we solve version
> compatibility issues?

For myself, yes, I'd say so.

References:
- Proposal to change locking in data-self-heal
  - From: Pranith Kumar Karampuri
- Re: Proposal to change locking in data-self-heal
  - From: Jeff Darcy
- Re: Proposal to change locking in data-self-heal
  - From: Anand Avati
- Re: Proposal to change locking in data-self-heal
  - From: Pranith Kumar Karampuri

Prev by Date: Re: Proposal to change locking in data-self-heal
Next by Date: Re: Proposal to change locking in data-self-heal
Previous by thread: Re: Proposal to change locking in data-self-heal
Next by thread: Re: Proposal to change locking in data-self-heal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Gluster Users] [Ceph Users] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux