Re: Proposal to change locking in data-self-heal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 21 May 2013 09:58:46 -0400
Jeff Darcy <jdarcy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> [...]
> That's actually how it used to work, which led to many complaints from users 
> who would see stalls accessing large files (most often VM images) over GigE 
> while self-heal was in progress.  Many considered it a show-stopper, and the 
> current "granular self-heal" approach was implemented to address it.  I'm not 
> sure whether the old behavior is still available as an option.  If not (which 
> is what I suspect) then you're correct that it might be worth considering as an 
> enhancement.

See it as a corner case of a configurable option like:

self-heal-chunksize = X
128k < X < (unsigned)-1 (meaning all bits 1, don't know how many you have
here :-)

-- 
Regards,
Stephan




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux