Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Is it normal behavior that the reference count drops to zero while the > brick is being used by a client? Is there a reference count problem > somewhere? I added debug message to trace transport reference counts, I found something that looks rotten. Here is brick startup: [socket.c:2975:socket_listen] rpc_transport_ref(0x7f7ff6bf5000) 0 -> 1 [socket.c:2817:socket_connect] rpc_transport_ref(0x7f7ff6fbd000) 1 -> 2 [socket.c:2975:socket_listen] rpc_transport_ref(0x7f7ff6fd0000) 0 -> 1 [socket.c:2548:socket_server_event_handler] rpc_transport_ref(0x7f7ff6fcc000) 0 -> 1 [socket.c:2548:socket_server_event_handler] rpc_transport_ref(0x7f7ff6fcd000) 0 -> 1 [rpcsvc.c:309:rpcsvc_request_init] rpc_transport_ref(0x7f7ff6fcd000) 1 -> 2 [rpcsvc.c:282:rpcsvc_request_destroy] rpc_transport_unref(0x7f7ff6fcd000) 2 -> 1 [rpcsvc.c:309:rpcsvc_request_init] rpc_transport_ref(0x7f7ff6fcd000) 1 -> 2 [rpcsvc.c:282:rpcsvc_request_destroy] rpc_transport_unref(0x7f7ff6fcd000) 2 -> 1 [rpcsvc.c:309:rpcsvc_request_init] rpc_transport_ref(0x7f7ff6fcd000) 1 -> 2 [rpcsvc.c:282:rpcsvc_request_destroy] rpc_transport_unref(0x7f7ff6fcd000) 2 -> 1 [rpcsvc.c:309:rpcsvc_request_init] rpc_transport_ref(0x7f7ff6fcd000) 1 -> 2 [rpcsvc.c:282:rpcsvc_request_destroy] rpc_transport_unref(0x7f7ff6fcd000) 2 -> 1 [rpcsvc.c:309:rpcsvc_request_init] rpc_transport_ref(0x7f7ff6fcd000) 1 -> 2 [server-helpers.c:762:server_alloc_frame] rpc_transport_ref(0x7f7ff6fcd000) -151203840 -> -151201064 We can note that -151203840 is 0xf6fcd000, which oddly looks like transport address itself. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@xxxxxxxxxx
