On 25.03.2013 09:38, Vidar Hokstad wrote:
I'm happy you recognise the issue of Java. I'd see having to drag that
around as a major barrier. One of the major benefits of glusterfs is
the
simplicity of deployment compared to many alternatives, and that
benefit
would be massively diminished if I needed to deal with a Java
dependency.
Also a user. I'd hate to see further complexity added, especially
through java.
One of the strong points of glusterfs for me is the relative simplicity
of it and ease of use (in contrast to say, the voodoo required to
install and maintain ceph):
`gluster peer proble`
`gluster volume create`
Voila, you're up and running!
There's work to be done in stability and performance, though.
IMHO,
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
