Re: Automated regression tests now part of development work flow

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/25/2013 10:51 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote:
On 10/21/2012 02:53 AM, Anand Avati wrote:

More details on how to write test cases with examples and how the
framework works can be found at -

1. "tests: pre-commit regression tests"
https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/commit/bb41c8ab88f1a3d8c54b635674d0a72133623496

2. tests/README in glusterfs.git
3. Example new change - http://review.gluster.org/4114

Please offer feedback on how the framework can be improved (inclusion of
more tools?) to capture test cases better.


This is a simple question on guide lines of writing a test case, and has
raised due to failure of tests for patch http://review.gluster.org/4567
in particular.

Looks like the failure of the tests for this patch (logs here
http://build.gluster.org/job/regression/729/consoleFull ) are due to
missing 'cleanup;' at the end of the script added in this patch. But the
question is, should the test script always 'assume' it starts from a
clean slate, or should it call a 'cleanup;' at the beginning all the time?

It would help me to review the patchsets by having clear answer to this.


I consider bug-000000.t to be the template and it does contain cleanup at the end of it. Maybe we should add this detail to tests/README?

-Vijay




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux