Anand Avati <anand.avati@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Now you are showing a segfault backtrace from glusterd, while previously > (the "single thread" backtrace) was from glusterfsd. Are both having > problems? As I said, it is unrelated: it appears just because I linked with -lefence. That bug is usually hidden but since it is there I suggest it could be fixed. I understand this is an off-by-one in an array allocation? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@xxxxxxxxxx