Re: Clone or re-open?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Re-open the bug with a description of how it was misunderstood (copy-paste your email).

Thanks,
Avati

On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Joe Julian <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Eco reported https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=763897, something I've been complaining about for some time and thought I'd also filed a bug on (but apparently I didn't). Pranith misunderstood the bug and closed it.

The bug is about setting the first host's name from itself. The current method of setting the first host's name from the second seems like a horrible kludge and is a hindrance to automated installs.

Attempting to set a server's own hostname through peer probe responds, "Probe on localhost not needed". There should be a way of doing this.

So should I clone that and add my comments, or should somebody reopen it?

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux