Vijay Bellur <vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > With 3.4.0, brick processes make use of ports from 49152 onwards > (instead of 24009). Do you per chance have any firewall rules that can > cause disconnects? I don't. I assume I have inherited the port number from 3.3.1? I have not recreated the volume since that time (this is another intersting thing to check). Can the old port number cause a problem on its own? > Nothing much to glean from the logs apart from the fact that there are a > bunch of annoying ENOENT messages in the bricks. Can you change the log > level to DEBUG and see if you notice anything amiss there? Right, will try that. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@xxxxxxxxxx
