Re: IB/RDMA Testing for 3.4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: John Mark Walker <johnmark@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IB/RDMA Testing for 3.4
From: Amar Tumballi <amarts@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 12:03:30 +0530
Cc: Gluster Devel <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1814290071.54343265.1355783248445.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121029 Thunderbird/16.0.2

On 12/18/2012 03:57 AM, John Mark Walker wrote:

Greetings, Devs - is it worth it to call out IB/RDMA as something we want more testing of for 3.4?

Or are we not yet ready to really push that as "production-ready"?

Lets not call RDMA/IB 'production-ready' by 3.4.0 for sure. But by 3.4.1or 3.4.2 when we get some feedback after testing, we can say its ready.


Regards,
Amar

Follow-Ups:
- Re: IB/RDMA Testing for 3.4
  - From: Andrew Holway

References:
- IB/RDMA Testing for 3.4
  - From: John Mark Walker

Prev by Date: IB/RDMA Testing for 3.4
Next by Date: Re: IB/RDMA Testing for 3.4
Previous by thread: IB/RDMA Testing for 3.4
Next by thread: Re: IB/RDMA Testing for 3.4
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Gluster Users] [Ceph Users] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux