No. Output formats in that way generally start out nice but as you start adding more fields, formatting them becomes difficult IMO. Pranith ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephan von Krawczynski" <skraw@xxxxxxxxxx> To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "gluster-users" <gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 7:01:57 PM Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peer status' Top posting and kidding is a bit exaggerated for one posting ... You are not seriously talking about 80 char terminals for an output that is commonly used by scripts and stuff like nagios, are you? On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 08:46:22 -0400 (EDT) Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > hi Amar, > This is the format we considered initially but we did not go with this because it may exceed 80 chars and wrap over for small terminals if we want to add more fields in future. > > Pranith. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Amar Tumballi" <amarts@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>, "gluster-users" <gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 4:36:07 PM > Subject: [Gluster-users] FeedBack Requested : Changes to CLI output of 'peer status' > > Hi, > > Wanted to check if any one is using gluster CLI output of 'peer status' > in their scripts/programs? If yes, let me know. If not, we are trying to > make it more script friendly. > > For example the current output would look something like: > > ----- > Hostname: 10.70.36.7 > Uuid: c7283ee7-0e8d-4cb8-8552-a63ab05deaa7 > State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) > > Hostname: 10.70.36.6 > Uuid: 5a2fdeb3-e63e-4e56-aebe-8b68a5abfcef > State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) > > ----- > > New changes would make it look like : > > ------- > UUID Hostname Status > c7283ee7-0e8d-4cb8-8552-a63ab05deaa7 10.70.36.7 Connected > 5a2fdeb3-e63e-4e56-aebe-8b68a5abfcef 10.70.36.6 Connected > > ------- > > If anyone has better format, or want more information, let us know now. > I would keep timeout for this mail as 3 more working days, and without > any response, we will go ahead with the change. > > Regards, > Amar > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > -- Regards, Stephan _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
