On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 01:18:45PM +0000, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: > Yes, I went from 1 brick to 2 bricks. I will try 2->, but is 1->2 known > to have issues? 2->3 seems to work much better. logs report a bunch of ENOENT, but the processes using the filesystem do not notice. [2012-08-19 15:56:51.669680] I [fuse-bridge.c:4195:fuse_graph_setup] 0-fuse: switched to graph 1 [2012-08-19 15:56:51.670553] I [client-handshake.c:453: client_set_lk_version_cbk] 1-vndfs-client-2: Server lk version = 1 [2012-08-19 15:56:51.677781] I [dht-layout.c:593:dht_layout_normalize] 1-vndfs-dht: found anomalies in /. holes=1 overlaps=0 [2012-08-19 15:56:51.692181] I [client.c:2151:notify] 0-vndfs-client-0: current graph is no longer active, destroying rpc_client [2012-08-19 15:56:51.692642] I [client.c:2151:notify] 0-vndfs-client-1: current graph is no longer active, destroying rpc_client [2012-08-19 15:56:51.694201] I [client.c:2090:client_rpc_notify] 0-vndfs-client-0: disconnected [2012-08-19 15:56:51.694658] I [client.c:2090:client_rpc_notify] 0-vndfs-client-1: disconnected [2012-08-19 15:56:51.713532] W [client3_1-fops.c:1954:client3_1_setattr_cbk] 1-vndfs-client-2: remote operation failed: No such file or directory [2012-08-19 15:56:51.732550] W [client3_1-fops.c:327:client3_1_mkdir_cbk] 1-vndfs-client-2: remote operation failed: No such file or directory. Path: <gfid:18d83ff6-01c3-4078-9af1-0033b0621a94>/0f (00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000) -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@xxxxxxxxxx
