-Amar
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I have hit a bug in glusterfs on NetBSD, but I wonder if NetBSD FUSE is
the culprit, or if the problem is in glusterfs itself. If I rename and
open file, the unsync data get lost (it is replaced by a chunk of
zeroes).
The test case below exhibit the bug. Does it happens on Linux too, or is
it a problem in NetBSD FUSE?
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <err.h>
#include <sysexits.h>
int
main(void)
{
int fd1, fd2;
char buf[] = "abcdefgh";
char buf2[] = "xxxxxxxx";
(void)unlink("tmp");
(void)unlink("tmp2");
if ((fd1 = open("tmp", O_CREAT|O_RDWR, 0644)) == -1)
err(EX_OSERR, "cannot open tmp");
if (write(fd1, buf, sizeof(buf)) != sizeof(buf))
err(EX_OSERR, "write failed");
if (rename("tmp", "tmp2") == -1)
err(EX_OSERR, "rename failed");
/* No bug if fd1 is closed or fsync'ed before rename */
(void)close(fd1);
if ((fd2 = open("tmp2", O_RDONLY, 0)) == -1)
err(EX_OSERR, "cannot open tmp2");
if (read(fd2, buf2, sizeof(buf2)) != sizeof(buf2))
err(EX_OSERR, "read failed");
(void)close(fd2);
printf("buf = \"%s\"\nbuf2 = \"%s\"\n", buf, buf2);
return 0;
}
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
