Am Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:47:38 -0400 schrieb David Coulson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: Hello David, thanks for your quick reply. I already considered a replica count of 3 (and six servers at all, correct?), but the problem would still be that two hard drives from the same "replica group" were not allowed to fail at the same time. > Try doing a distributed-replica with a replica count of 3. Not really > 'RAID-6' comparable, but you can have two nodes fail without outage. > > http://download.gluster.com/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.2/Documentation/AG/html/sect-Administration_Guide--Setting_Volumes-Distributed_Replicated.html > > On 3/29/12 10:39 AM, Pascal wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > I would like to know if it is possible to setup a GlusterFS > > installation which is comparable to a RAID 6? I did some research in > > the community and several mailing lists and all I could find were > > the similar request from 2009 > > (http://gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2009-May/002208.html, > > http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.ph/Talk:GlusterFS_Roadmap_Suggestions). > > > > I would just like to have a scenario where two GlusterFS > > nodes/servers, respectively their hard drives, could fail at the > > same time. > > > > Thanks in advance! > > Pascal > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Gluster-devel mailing list > > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx > > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
