Anand Avati <anand.avati@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > That sounds good! I'm wondering if we should update storage/posix to use > POSIX.2008 updates for its syscalls. That would make glusterfs much less portable. Note that my patch does not forbid using regulat link(2), which will work fine for setups that do not use DHT. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@xxxxxxxxxx
