Re: atomic operations fails_

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Fredrik Widlund <fredrik.widlund@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: atomic operations fails_
From: Vikas Gorur <vikas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:11:06 +0530
Cc: Anand Avati <avati@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <A926055927E1404BB6D679FDF8C40CDB9AFAE2D316@exchange0.ad.qbrick.com>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)

Fredrik Widlund wrote:

Can you reproduce this behavior on your end?

We've been able to reproduce this, and are looking into it.

Vikas
--
Engineer - Gluster, Inc.

References:
- atomic operations fails_
  - From: Fredrik Widlund
- Re: atomic operations fails_
  - From: Anand Avati
- RE: atomic operations fails_
  - From: Fredrik Widlund
- RE: atomic operations fails_
  - From: Fredrik Widlund

Prev by Date: RE: atomic operations fails_
Next by Date: Re: LOOKUP conflict => OPEN fails_
Previous by thread: RE: atomic operations fails_
Next by thread: 3.0.2 in Debian
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Gluster Users] [Ceph Users] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux