Re: [Gluster-users] I/O fair share to avoid I/O bottlenecks on small clsuters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Can you tell us a little more about your setup? I'm running many hundreds of vms on our cluster but I found infiniband is necessary if you have any large amount of io (databases, lots of drive access etc).

You may simply be saturating your io if you only have a single gigabit interface to your storage. Things like NFS mount can direct all your io down one gig link and can be the death knell to your distributed parallel filer.

-Mic

Ran wrote:
Hi ,
I recently posted an issue regarding a situation that happen when
say 1 virtual machine images takes down the entire server IO
then the entire storage become slow in such way that noting work
emails , web etc...
gluster gays posted that virtual machine is a main goal of the storage
and that they probebly implement a fair share IO options to avoid this cases .

Can anyone tell me what are the plans for this , it apear to me that
this is 1 of the most important issues on such storage seens it is not
possible to run more then a few virtual machins in parallel .

Many thanks ,
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users





[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux