Re: is it a bug? (unify+rr)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Yi Ling <lingyi.pro@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: is it a bug? (unify+rr)
From: Amar Tumballi <amar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:39:14 -0700
Cc: Raghavendra G <raghavendra@xxxxxxxxxxx>, gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1bc95df60907310541p1df99edct52460bbe69d38f01@mail.gmail.com>

Any reason to go with 'cluster/unify' instead of 'cluster/distribute'? Other than for 'switch' scheduler, we recommend 'cluster/distribute' for combining the storage.

On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 5:41 AM, Yi Ling <lingyi.pro@gmail.com> wrote:

i want to keen a copy of namespace on each server ~~~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: is it a bug? (unify+rr)
  - From: Yi Ling

References:
- is it a bug? (unify+rr)
  - From: Yi Ling
- Re: is it a bug? (unify+rr)
  - From: Raghavendra G
- Re: is it a bug? (unify+rr)
  - From: Yi Ling
- Re: is it a bug? (unify+rr)
  - From: Yi Ling

Prev by Date: RE: weird response of gluster_readdir
Next by Date: Re: is it a bug? (unify+rr)
Previous by thread: Re: is it a bug? (unify+rr)
Next by thread: Re: is it a bug? (unify+rr)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Gluster Users] [Ceph Users] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux