On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Gordan Bobic <gordan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This doesn't seem to apply against 2.0.3. Can you provide a patch vs. 2.0.3 release?
Note, however, that I have logging enabled on the other (non-root) file systems, and those don't seem to be leaking (or if they are, at least not as obviously).
Gordan
Raghavendra G wrote:
Hi Gordon,<http://patches.gluster.com/patch/679/>
There was a patch submitted by gowda and accepted regarding a memory leak in
logging.
The commit id is 8d74fe9ba6c3c2f68f71cacd56fad9328b8b0090
Can this fix the leak observed above?
regards,
Raghavendra
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Gordan Bobic <gordan@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:gordan@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Anand Avati wrote:
I have just put it back as it was (mounted with
-o direct-io-mode=off,log-level=NONE,log-file=/dev/null
and sure enough the leak disappeared. The CPU usage is also
down to a much
more reasonable 25-30%.
Should I bother with a bugzilla report, or is this already a
known issue in
2.0.2?
We have not faced any leaks associated with direct-io-mode or logs.
Please do file a bug report with the steps to reproduce it.
Filed bug 122.
Gordan
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
--
Raghavendra G
