Re: Performance Translators' Stability and Usefulness - Regression test outline

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Gluster Devel <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Performance Translators' Stability and Usefulness - Regression test outline
From: Gordan Bobic <gordan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:57:30 +0100
In-reply-to: <8bd4838e0907071210l6df9c76ck6011968b5775d016@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20081203 Shredder/3.0b2pre

Right - now that we're all agreed, I think we should knock this threadon the head, stop criticizing and start heading toward where we wantthis project to be by providing whatever contribution we can (codepatches, putting together reproducible test cases for error conditions,etc.).


Gordan

References:
- Performance Translators' Stability and Usefulness
  - From: Gordan Bobic
- Re: Performance Translators' Stability and Usefulness
  - From: Jacques Mattheij
- Re: Performance Translators' Stability and Usefulness - Regression test outline
  - From: Mickey Mazarick
- Re: Performance Translators' Stability and Usefulness - Regression test outline
  - From: Geoff Kassel
- Re: Performance Translators' Stability and Usefulness - Regression test outline
  - From: Anand Avati

Prev by Date: Re: Performance Translators' Stability and Usefulness - Regression test outline
Next by Date: Re: Performance Translators' Stability and Usefulness - Regression test outline
Previous by thread: Re: Performance Translators' Stability and Usefulness - Regression test outline
Next by thread: Re: Performance Translators' Stability and Usefulness - Regression test outline
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Gluster Users] [Ceph Users] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]