Re: replicate/distribute oddities in 2.0.0 Was Re: rc8

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: 'Gluster Devel' <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: replicate/distribute oddities in 2.0.0 Was Re: rc8
From: Gordan Bobic <gordan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 21:40:05 +0100
In-reply-to: <104d4e0e0905121313o4a2a2c2araa41d493b457421a@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090107)

Liam Slusser wrote:

I was under the impression that the namespace volume is not needed with2.0 replication.


It isn't required for AFR.

Gordan

References:
- replicate/distribute oddities in 2.0.0 Was Re: rc8
  - From: Liam Slusser
- Re: replicate/distribute oddities in 2.0.0 Was Re: rc8
  - From: Liam Slusser
- Re: replicate/distribute oddities in 2.0.0 Was Re: rc8
  - From: Liam Slusser
- Re: replicate/distribute oddities in 2.0.0 Was Re: rc8
  - From: Alexey Filin
- Re: replicate/distribute oddities in 2.0.0 Was Re: rc8
  - From: Liam Slusser

Prev by Date: Re: replicate/distribute oddities in 2.0.0 Was Re: rc8
Next by Date: Experience with kernel NFS reexport
Previous by thread: Re: replicate/distribute oddities in 2.0.0 Was Re: rc8
Next by thread: Safe to export replicated brick using samba?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Gluster Users] [Ceph Users] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux