On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:33:06 +1000, Geoff Kassel
<gkassel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Has anyone seen signs of the data corruption or self-heal bugs for
this
> release candidate yet? It'd be really good if this release candidate
> finally puts the nails in the coffins of those worrisome bugs.
I haven't had a chance to test that, but then again I didn't have a
specific use-case that reliably triggered the bug.
I'll run a full md5 check on all the files in the tree and see if there are
differences. If there still are after a full:
ls -laR; find . -type f -exec head -c1 '{}' \;
Then I guess there are still problems with healing (e.g. metadata being the
same but file size being different not triggering healing according to
favorite-child heal-of-last-resort).
Will test for that tonight.
Gordan
