Re: AFR problem with 2.0rc4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:56:25 +0530, Vikas Gorur <vikas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> 2009/3/19 Gordan Bobic <gordan@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> The subvolumes have to be listed in the same order on all nodes, because
>> that is the order of precedence and failover for lock servers. Could it
>> be
>> that this was the reason why you were seing problems?
> 
> That is one reason. Another reason is that the extended attributes
> 'replicate' uses to keep track of the most recent copy of the file
> make no sense if two different clients have differently ordered
> subvolumes.

How does this affect adding new servers into an existing cluster?

Gordan




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux