Re: GlusterFS Process Growing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gordan Bobic wrote:
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:25:59 +0530, Anand Avati <avati@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Is there a parameter to limit this cache? And how does this compare to
the normal page cache on the underlying FS?
It is not possible to limit this cache as it is decided by the dcache
pruning algorithm in the linux kernel vm. You can however force a
forget of all the build cache by doing an 'echo 3 >
/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches'

Interesting, I thought the drop_caches didn't include the caches that
reflect in the process size itself. So the 300MB of the resident size of
glusterfs gets included? I'll have to try this. So, running

# updatedb

and/or

# ls -laR /

should make it go up to maximum size and not grow much further?

Just tested this. After updatedb and ls -laR the process size is not noticeably bigger. Since this would have touched all the files on the FS, it seems to indicate that the process growth to 300MB is not driven purely by the number of file/directory entries.

On a related note,
# echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
did nothing to reduce the size of the glusterfs processes. They remain the same size they were before.

Gordan




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux