Re: Multicast Support?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 15:57:57 +0530, Vikas Gorur <vikas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Gordon,
> 
> (Replying to both your mails)
> 
> Implementing multicast would be difficult since multicasting only
> works for UDP, and GlusterFS relies on a TCP connection. Moving GlusterFS
> to use UDP would require extensive changes and would bring many new
> problems of its own.
> 
> Regarding the configuration you'd want to conserve bandwidth for some of
> your
> machines, you could do something like this (shown for one machine):
> 
>              simple nfs-like
>              glusterfs                  afr
> low b/w box  --------> /mnt/glusterfs --------> other three boxen
> 
>                        high b/w box
> 
> I don't see how this helps, though. The high b/w box has to send writes
> to the other three machines anyway, thus robbing them of their bandwidth?

The main point to this would be to ensure that each machine doesn't have to
replicate ALL it's writes to ALL peers - instead, it could replicate them
to _one_ central high-bandwidth peer which then replicates to other
satellite peers. This means that the bandwidth is not limited to 1/n of
upstream bandwdith of satellite peers - instead the full upstream bandwidth
would be achieved. True, the central peer still consumes n times more
bandwidth (replicates full bandwidth to each satellite peer), but the main
point is to overcome the satellite peer bottleneck by avoiding the write
bandwidth multiplication that causes the scalability collapse.

Gordan




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux