Hi, Noticed an odd thing with GlusterFS 2.x. It (as compared to 1.3.8) now takes over a lot of privileged ports - and a lot of times, the ports stolen aren't really 'free' for GlusterFS to be using. For example, I run mail servers, and provide the usual access methods - POP3, IMAP, and their SSL variants on ports 993 and 995. I've found that GlusterFS will often take over ports 993 and 995 - and about twenty other privileged ports at the same time. Sometimes really low ports, like port 1 (!) This stops other services from binding to these ports. Hence, when I attempt a full restart of my GlusterFS dependent services (i.e. when changing GlusterFS configuration, or recovering from a crash) I find most of my services won't restart properly, which is a big issue for me. Browsing through the code, I found the CLIENT_PORT_CIELING (sic - that should probably be CLIENT_PORT_CEILING) setting in the transport translators, and I've altered this appropriately up to 65536, so that there's no competition between GlusterFS and my existing services. However, I feel that this is a somewhat inconvenient step to have to make in order to get GlusterFS to play nice with other services. Would it be possible to have a translator configuration option that allows this to be set from a server or client volume file, without having to manually patch and recompile GlusterFS each time I want to change this setting? Thank you in advance for your time and effort in considering my request. Kind regards, Geoff Kassel.
