Nevermind, the conf files I put up were for my dht problem, from which
I stripped out my unify stuff (I was reducing conf file complexity to
focus on the dht problem). I'll get back to this once I make dht work.
Dan Parsons
On Jan 13, 2009, at 10:07 AM, Dan Parsons wrote:
Using the same disk, yes, but two separate directories. I put the
conf files in my original email to the list.
Dan Parsons
On Jan 13, 2009, at 3:16 AM, Krishna Srinivas wrote:
Dan,
Are you using same disk for both dht and stripe at the back end? i.e
create two directories on the disk and export, use one for dht and
one
for stripe?
Can you mail the vol files?
Krishna
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Dan Parsons <dparsons@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I'm following the directions on this page:
http://www.gluster.org/docs/index.php/Advanced_Striping_with_GlusterFS_2.0
Following the above directions, you have a dht volume and a stripe
volume
joined together via unify. When mounting that unify volume, df
reports twice
the actual available capacity. If I remove one of the dht/stripe
volumes
from the unify volume, df reports normal disk usage. So, I can
understand
why this is happening (gluster sees two separate volumes) but as
the same
group of servers host the dht & stripe volumes, the actual space
is half
what gluster thinks it is. Is this the intended behavior?
My end-goal here is to be able to have some files dht'd and some
striped.
This seems to be the best way to do it, if I'm wrong please let me
know.
Dan Parsons
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
