Re: upgrading; 1.4 vs waiting for 2.x

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Dan Parsons <dparsons@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Anyone? :)
> ------Original Message------
> From: Dan Parsons
> Sender: gluster-devel-bounces+dparsons=nyip.net@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: Gluster Developers Discussion List
> Subject: upgrading; 1.4 vs waiting for 2.x
> Sent: Jan 7, 2009 10:09 AM
>
> I really need to upgrade to 1.4 or 2.x or whatever it's going to be
> called ASAP for the io-cache memory leak fix. I was going to do it
> right away after the holiday break, but now I've read of this 2.x
> thing. Please answer these two questions for me:
>
> (1) When do you expect 2.0 to be released?

Within few days. You could use 1.4 latest release if you want to try
it now (1.4 is being renamed as 2.0)

>
> (2) I rely very heavily on the ioc and stripe xlators. I'd also like
> to consider using the new HA xlator. Are there any known bugs with
> them in the latest rc? If so, can you please direct me to a web page
> that has details on them?

HA does not support locking (i.e a held lock is lost if a connection
goes down - we will fix it soon) No other known bugs.

>
> Dan Parsons
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
>
>
>
> Dan Parsons
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
>




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux