Re: What if a subvolume becomes read-only?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 1:03 AM, KwangErn Liew <ke.liew@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Vikas Gorur <vikas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
2008/11/14 Onyx <lists@xxxxxxxx>:
> Hi,
>
> I just had a problem with a disk failure. It was an ext3 partition, and
> suddenly, bc of a problem, it automatically remounted as read-only.
> It was not in a glusterfs setup yet, but it got me thinking...
> What would have happened if that partition was in an afr setup?
> I think glusterfs would hang on a write, correct?

No, AFR would not hang. The write would fail on that volume, but as long
as the write succeeds on atleast one volume, AFR reports success.

Is there N tries before write is reported to be failed on that volume? Or is it failed immediately?

There are no retries. It is failed immediately.
 



KwangErn

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




--
Raghavendra G


[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux