Rommer,
It is not a memory leak.
pl_forget() is not called by protocol/server, pl_forget() is called by __inode_destroy() after inode->ref becomes 0 (zero).
--
gowda
It is not a memory leak.
pl_forget() is not called by protocol/server, pl_forget() is called by __inode_destroy() after inode->ref becomes 0 (zero).
--
gowda
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 8:13 PM, Rommer <rommer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello,
I found memory leak in posix-locks xlator:
pl_inode_t structure for locking allocated in functions
truncate_stat_cbk(), pl_open_cbk() and pl_create_cbk() and
freeing only in pl_forget() function, that never calling by
server xlator. Server xlator does only inode_forget(), that
does not free this structure from inode->ctx dictionary.
Rommer.
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
