Re: Upgrade planning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>
>
> Since glusterfs is so flexible/configurable, I suspect
> that any substantial deployment will have to deal with
> this at some point.  Anytime a client mounts shares
> from two different servers it is likely to run into
> this problem.  Should glusterfs perhaps develop a
> strategy for administrators to deal with this in a
> simple way?  Whether that be by suggesting a certain
> package management strategy to distributors (allowing
> mulitiple glusterfs client packages to be installed on
> the same machine), or by making the client binaries
> become backwards compatible?  I fear that without a
> clean (and easy) solution to this serious admins might
> shy away from deploying glusterfs in production
> environments.  Thoughts?
>
> Martin,
 Yes! we know that is a limitation as of now. We have aim to have backward
compatibility from 1.5.x releases. But currently 1.3 -> 1.4 doesn't work
fine. (and even 1.4.0qaXX releases may not work with other 1.4.0qa releases
as there may be some changes in APIs internally.

Regards,
Amar


[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux