Hi Nicolas, Thanks for info. I haven't yet tested fuse-2.7.4, but there was a discussion on fuse mailing list saying 2.6.26 kernel itself is slow. http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=489DB3DD.8050601%40up.ac.za&forum_name=fuse-devel I suspect it may not have anything to do with GlusterFS or glusterfs patched fuse. Regards, Amar 2008/8/14 nicolas prochazka <prochazka.nicolas@xxxxxxxxx> > I'm trying fuse from kernel tree and fuse 2.7.4 + glusterfs patch and > booster. > from fuse kernel and fuse 2.7.4 + patch : glusterfs is running but > slowly than before ( 10Mbits/s less ) > booster translator seems to be not working , however it seems very > interesting as performance translator. > > Regards, > Nicolas > > > > 2008/8/14 Amar S. Tumballi <amar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > Hi Nicolas, > > Thanks for sharing info. Just few questions.. when using 2.6.24 kernel > you > > used fuse module from the kernel tree itself? and when you say slow, is > it > > file operations (like out put of dd/iozone etc) or regular metadata ops > > (like 'ls', 'find', 'du')? > > > > Regards, > > Amar > > > > 2008/8/14 nicolas prochazka <prochazka.nicolas@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Hi, > >> I'm using glusterfs with ten node without problem, > >> but ths week, I update my differents serveur to 2.6.26.2 , before > >> kernel were 2.6.24 and then, > >> glusterfs seems to be have some problem, it is very slowly. > >> > >> Is this issue known ? > >> > >> Regards, > >> Nicolas Prochazka. > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Gluster-devel mailing list > >> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx > >> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > > > > > > -- > > Amar Tumballi > > Gluster/GlusterFS Hacker > > [bulde on #gluster/irc.gnu.org] > > http://www.zresearch.com - Commoditizing Super Storage! > > > > -- Amar Tumballi Gluster/GlusterFS Hacker [bulde on #gluster/irc.gnu.org] http://www.zresearch.com - Commoditizing Super Storage!
