Re: FUSE changes - have they been sent upstream?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Neil Wilson" <neil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: FUSE changes - have they been sent upstream?
From: "Anand Avati" <avati@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:38:04 +0530
Cc: Gluster Developers Discussion List <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <50d9f33a0808110228u2de506c8j3dbd4ce429659bcf@mail.gmail.com>

Are the FUSE performance patches generally applicable? Have they been
> sent upstream to the Fuse developers?
>

Not yet, but we plan to submit them soon.

References:
- FUSE changes - have they been sent upstream?
  - From: Neil Wilson

Prev by Date: Re: FTBFS - 1.3.10
Next by Date: Re: Two patches against glusterfs-1.3.10
Previous by thread: FUSE changes - have they been sent upstream?
Next by thread: Gluster on MAC OS X
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Gluster Users] [Ceph Users] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux