Re: Busybox and Glusterfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Short answer is Not yet.

GlusterFS is relatively easy to fit in an embedded environment. Particularly
server side doesn't even need fuse. BusyBox against glibc should work seamlessly.
uClibc may have issues. If you find any issues with uClibc and if you find uClibc
is compelling enough, we can take a look at it. In my opinion, storage server
environment will have enough resources to use glibc.

We are also planning to release an embedded image of GlusterFS with NFS and Samba
re-export after 1.4 release.

--
Anand Babu Periasamy
GPG Key ID: 0x62E15A31
Blog [http://ab.freeshell.org]
The GNU Operating System [http://www.gnu.org]
Z RESEARCH Inc [http://www.zresearch.com]



chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi Guys,

I would like to know if anyone has tried and successfully used busybox with a Glusterfs in server mode?


_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux