Rohan Is this problem still there? can it be reproduced? can you give us access to your machine to debug? Krishna On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Rohan <rohan.thale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2008-07-17 20:54:14 E [afr.c:2177:afr_open] AFR-G3-B4: self heal failed, > returning EIO > 2008-07-17 20:54:14 E [unify.c:827:unify_open_cbk] bricks: Open success on > namespace, failed on child node > 2008-07-17 20:54:14 E [fuse-bridge.c:692:fuse_fd_cbk] glusterfs-fuse: > 533995: (12) > /mailbox/0/0/spam@xxxxxx/mails/f2a205a8e4d754fe3f8311f6f958a94da22d9977 => > -1 (5) > 2008-07-17 20:54:14 W [client-protocol.c:280:client_protocol_xfer] > GFS-ACT-ST-007-4: attempting to pipeline request type(1) op(34) with > handshake > 2008-07-17 20:54:55 W [client-protocol.c:205:call_bail] GFS-ACT-ST-007-2: > activating bail-out. pending frames = 1. last sent = 2008-07-17 20:54:14. > last received = 2008-07-17 20:54:14 transport-timeout = 40 > 2008-07-17 20:54:55 C [client-protocol.c:212:call_bail] GFS-ACT-ST-007-2: > bailing transport > 2008-07-17 20:54:55 W [client-protocol.c:4777:client_protocol_cleanup] > GFS-ACT-ST-007-2: cleaning up state in transport object 0x16e13ea0 > 2008-07-17 20:54:55 E [client-protocol.c:4827:client_protocol_cleanup] > GFS-ACT-ST-007-2: forced unwinding frame type(2) op(5) reply=@0x2aaabbc02b50 > 2008-07-17 20:54:55 E [client-protocol.c:4239:client_lock_cbk] > GFS-ACT-ST-007-2: no proper reply from server, returning ENOTCONN > 2008-07-17 20:54:55 E [afr.c:1909:afr_selfheal_lock_cbk] AFR-G3-B2: > (path=/mailbox/0/0/spam@xxxxxx/mails/2e90b5b2e407829e95246df6052250ac21e2cdc > 9o child=GFS-ACT-ST-007-2) op_ret=-1 op_errno=107 > 2008-07-17 20:54:55 E [afr.c:2177:afr_open] AFR-G3-B2: self heal failed, > returning EIO > 2008-07-17 20:54:55 E [unify.c:827:unify_open_cbk] bricks: Open success on > namespace, failed on child node > 2008-07-17 20:54:55 E [fuse-bridge.c:692:fuse_fd_cbk] glusterfs-fuse: > 534020: (12) > /mailbox/0/0/spam@xxxxxx/mails/2e90b5b2e407829e95246df6052250ac21e2cdc9o => > -1 (5) > 2008-07-17 20:54:55 W [client-protocol.c:280:client_protocol_xfer] > GFS-ACT-ST-007-2: attempting to pipeline request type(1) op(34) with > handshake > 2008-07-17 20:55:45 W [client-protocol.c:205:call_bail] GFS-ACT-ST-007-2: > activating bail-out. pending frames = 1. last sent = 2008-07-17 20:54:55. > last received = 2008-07-17 20:54:55 transport-timeout = 40 > 2008-07-17 20:55:45 C [client-protocol.c:212:call_bail] GFS-ACT-ST-007-2: > bailing transport > 2008-07-17 20:55:45 W [client-protocol.c:4777:client_protocol_cleanup] > GFS-ACT-ST-007-2: cleaning up state in transport object 0x16e13ea0 > 2008-07-17 20:55:45 E [client-protocol.c:4827:client_protocol_cleanup] > GFS-ACT-ST-007-2: forced unwinding frame type(2) op(5) reply=@0x2aaabf1f6260 > 2008-07-17 20:55:45 E [client-protocol.c:4239:client_lock_cbk] > GFS-ACT-ST-007-2: no proper reply from server, returning ENOTCONN > 2008-07-17 20:55:45 E [afr.c:1909:afr_selfheal_lock_cbk] AFR-G3-B2: > (path=/mailbox/0/0/spam@xxxxxx/mails/bc11dddb59644779d99bfdf39b7e56f226068a4 > 3 child=GFS-ACT-ST-007-2) op_ret=-1 op_errno=107 > 2008-07-17 20:55:45 E [afr.c:2177:afr_open] AFR-G3-B2: self heal failed, > returning EIO > 2008-07-17 20:55:45 E [unify.c:827:unify_open_cbk] bricks: Open success on > namespace, failed on child node > 2008-07-17 20:55:45 E [fuse-bridge.c:692:fuse_fd_cbk] glusterfs-fuse: > 534035: (12) > /mailbox/0/0/spam@xxxxxx/mails/bc11dddb59644779d99bfdf39b7e56f226068a43 => > -1 (5) > 2008-07-17 20:55:45 W [client-protocol.c:280:client_protocol_xfer] > GFS-ACT-ST-007-2: attempting to pipeline request type(1) op(34) with > handshake > 2008-07-17 20:56:34 W [client-protocol.c:205:call_bail] GFS-ACT-ST-007-1: > activating bail-out. pending frames = 1. last sent = 2008-07-17 20:55:46. > last received = 2008-07-17 20:55:46 transport-timeout = 40 > 2008-07-17 20:56:34 C [client-protocol.c:212:call_bail] GFS-ACT-ST-007-1: > bailing transport > 2008-07-17 20:56:34 W [client-protocol.c:4777:client_protocol_cleanup] > GFS-ACT-ST-007-1: cleaning up state in transport object 0x16e0d020 > 2008-07-17 20:56:34 E [client-protocol.c:4827:client_protocol_cleanup] > GFS-ACT-ST-007-1: forced unwinding frame type(2) op(5) reply=@0x2aaabbbfc200 > 2008-07-17 20:56:34 E [client-protocol.c:4239:client_lock_cbk] > GFS-ACT-ST-007-1: no proper reply from server, returning ENOTCONN > 2008-07-17 20:56:34 E [afr.c:1909:afr_selfheal_lock_cbk] AFR-G3-B1: > (path=/mailbox/0/0/spam@xxxxxx/mails/d7ac63f0c00cc54887cc2181cca1c7fcc18f2c5 > 1 child=GFS-ACT-ST-007-1) op_ret=-1 op_errno=107 > 2008-07-17 20:56:34 E [afr.c:2177:afr_open] AFR-G3-B1: self heal failed, > returning EIO > 2008-07-17 20:56:34 E [unify.c:827:unify_open_cbk] bricks: Open success on > namespace, failed on child node > 2008-07-17 20:56:34 E [fuse-bridge.c:692:fuse_fd_cbk] glusterfs-fuse: > 534062: (12) > /mailbox/0/0/spam@xxxxxx/mails/d7ac63f0c00cc54887cc2181cca1c7fcc18f2c51 => > -1 (5) > 2008-07-17 20:56:34 W [client-protocol.c:280:client_protocol_xfer] > GFS-ACT-ST-007-1: attempting to pipeline request type(1) op(34) with > handshake > > -----Original Message----- > From: krishna.zresearch@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:krishna.zresearch@xxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of Krishna Srinivas > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 12:48 PM > To: Rohan > Cc: Amar S. Tumballi; Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: RE: Help needed > > Rohan, > Can access be given to these machines? Does the log have > any useful information? > Krishna > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Rohan <rohan.thale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> No these are not symlinks. >> >> >> >> _____ >> >> From: amarts@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:amarts@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Amar S. >> Tumballi >> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 12:34 PM >> To: Rohan >> Cc: Raghavendra G; Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: Re: RE: Help needed >> >> >> >> >> Can you make sure these are not symlinks? i have seen that if you issue >> open() over symlink, it tries to open the target, and it may not exits, so >> returns ENOENT. >> >> >> >> >> head: cannot open >> > `/gfs-data1/mailbox/0/0/spam@xxxxxx/mails/fc2080d273fb767df2660b52cd69b67eb1 >> <http://spam@xxxxxx/mails/fc2080d273fb767df2660b52cd69b67eb18e56f6o> >> 8e56f6o' for reading: No such file or directory >> >> head: cannot open >> > `/gfs-data1/mailbox/0/0/spam@xxxxxx/mails/6f444176af4a238239360800172a6a1a19 >> <http://spam@xxxxxx/mails/6f444176af4a238239360800172a6a1a193afbef> >> 3afbef' for reading: No such file or directory >> >> head: cannot open >> > `/gfs-data1/mailbox/0/0/spam@xxxxxx/mails/6bd73dbf7db1cf0c6acf56fa18d4f6fe63 >> <http://spam@xxxxxx/mails/6bd73dbf7db1cf0c6acf56fa18d4f6fe63f950eco> >> f950eco' for reading: No such file or directory >> >> head: cannot open >> > `/gfs-data1/mailbox/0/0/spam@xxxxxx/mails/3fec9cef25a2f43b1b1f0a712375dc23de >> <http://spam@xxxxxx/mails/3fec9cef25a2f43b1b1f0a712375dc23de30fb28o> >> 30fb28o' for reading: No such file or directory >> >> head: cannot open >> > `/gfs-data1/mailbox/0/0/spam@xxxxxx/mails/0fd0ba2a4d8c52de7c52b09abbfec726c6 >> <http://spam@xxxxxx/mails/0fd0ba2a4d8c52de7c52b09abbfec726c6e4e67bo> >> e4e67bo' for reading: No such file or directory >> >> head: cannot open >> > `/gfs-data1/mailbox/0/0/spam@xxxxxx/mails/52fae85ff4366d7d8492d5154ead0659fd >> <http://spam@xxxxxx/mails/52fae85ff4366d7d8492d5154ead0659fd37f48do> >> 37f48do' for reading: No such file or directory >> >> >> >> >> >> Why "No such file or directory" these errors are coming? These files are > not >> present in file system. Why find command finding them? >> >> >> >> Your help is really appreciated. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> Rohan >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-devel mailing list >> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Amar Tumballi >> Gluster/GlusterFS Hacker >> [bulde on #gluster/irc.gnu.org] >> http://www.zresearch.com - Commoditizing Super Storage! >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-devel mailing list >> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> > >
