Re: Improving real world performance by moving files closer to their target workloads

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 16 May 2008, Derek Price wrote:

gordan@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
This would need a change in the handling of how a file is locked/accessed. A lock would need to be made on all the nodes that could respond with the file. AFR doesn't quite do this, the primary node (first one on the AFR list) is the one that acts as the lock server. If this could be overcome, then you'd have most of the components you need.

What about a quorum locking solution like DLM provides? I think it doesn't matter if the server(s) that have copies of the files agree to the file lock, as long as any server that wants a lock knows to get approval from the quorum.

Isn't that effectively the same thing? Unless there is quorum, DLM locks out the entire FS (it also does this when a node dies, until it gets definitive confirmation that it has been successfully fenced). For normal file I/O all nodes in the cluster have to acknowledge a lock before it can be granted.

Gordan




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux